STOP TEXTING IN
THE THEATER, OR I’LL GUT EVERYTHING YOU LOVE!
Okay. Let’s talk
about The Gambler.
Mark Wahlberg
plays Jim Bennett in this remake of the 1974 movie by the same name.
Jim’s character,
born with a silver spoon in his mouth, grows up to write a paper
that regards a novel he read in high school. He wins an award and with it a
scholarship, goes to college, and eventually becomes an English professor at a
university.
Our movie starts
here.
Jim hates his job,
mostly because his students don’t honestly care about the subject matter.
A
serious gambling addiction possesses Jim. He takes all his money to casinos and
loses it, rides his chips until he loses every last one in some financial,
masochistic form of self-punishment.
Then, he borrows
money from gangsters so he can lose that, too, and get the crap beat out of him
in some physical, masochistic form of self-punishment.
He borrows from
one loan shark after another, until his family and even his loose associates
receive threats from the mob.
We confront, here,
the movie’s biggest turnoff (note that I didn’t say “problem”). Jim fails to
make the audience sympathetic towards him. Heck, I found myself more
sympathetic towards the mobsters who endure Jim’s runaround.
Here’s the thing,
though. Jim couldn’t get into this sort of trouble in exactly this sort of way
unless he exists as a complete jackass.
Reverse character
engineering: ask not how your character would react in a situation, but ask
what sort of character would create the desired situation.
We face a unique
circumstance with The Gambler, in
that it matters not whether we like Jim, and it matters not how Jim’s
circumstance arose.
Jim’s situation
proves symbolic enough to fit any audience member’s personal (present or past)
situation.
We all, at some
point, serve as slaves to one compulsion or another. We all know the discomfort
of debt and the deadlines we face to fulfill them.
Jim’s situation
exists as the sum of those compulsions and fears. We can, as audience members,
experience Jim’s world vicariously and yet on personal level.
The Gambler deals heavily with
compulsions not limited to those found at the blackjack table. John Goodman
speaks at lengths about alcoholism. A watch dealer confesses that he cannot
fight the urge to haggle.
The Gambler deals with debts. Not just
gambling debts. Not just monetary debts. All
debts, anything that one person can owe another, may it be the truth, an
apology, or whatever else chains us to the floor and twists our guts because we
can’t seem to cough up the goods.
Pardon the sexism,
but men don’t feel like men when they
owe, when they borrow, when they can’t pick up the check. I imagine women
wouldn’t recommend it, either. We feel weak, small, and impotent. We feel like
failure.
John Goodman’s
character, a dangerous loan shark, will only loan Jim money if Jim says, “I am
not a man.”
When one of
Goodman’s gangsters picks Jim up to meet Goodman for the (presumably) first
time, the gangster even calls himself Big and (lest that prove too subtle)
tells Jim that he, the gangster, possess a large penis.
Until the final
series of scenes—where, not coincidently, Jim can finally hold his head
high—Goodman wears only a towel so that we can witness how much larger he sits
than Jim. Goodman's character, in fact, sits in a car for this final scene, while Jim stands over him.
If the movie’s plot
performs you no favors, its dialogue will likely win you over. It sounded
Quentin Tarantino-good.
I can’t identify a
single actress or actor in this film that didn’t execute an admirable
job.
I feared, during
one of the final scenes, that the movie would cock tease its audience (sorry
for all the curses today, but QUIT TEXTING THROUGH THE WHOLE DAMN MOVIE,
YOU PRICKS!!!!).
I thought that a
certain scene with a roulette wheel would end with a black screen and credits
before it resolved. I felt grateful that director, Rupert Wyatt, didn't follow that path to nowhere.
The Gambler makes one final point. You can, under only two conditions, tell the whole world to go screw itself:
1)
You possess a vast amount of money, or
2)
You possess nothing to lose and don’t care.
I publish my blogs as follows:
Tuesdays: A look at the politics of
the entertainment world at EntertainmentMicroscope.blogspot.com.
Wednesdays: An inside look at my
novels (such as Daughters of Darkwana, which you can now find on Kindle) at
Darkwana.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment